|
I want to begin this study of "who is the antichrist"; we'll start with 1 John 2:18-23 as we will see several truths about this person called the antichrist: 18 "Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even (1) now are there (2)many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. 19They (3)went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would [no doubt] have continued with us: but [they went out], that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us. 20But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things.21I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth. 22Who is a liar but he that (4)denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 23Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: [(but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also]. (1) John probably wrote this book around 70AD - 90AD (2) When the Apostle John was alive he said "there are [already] many antichrists; this fly's in the face of all the Christians who believe in a future 1 person antichrist (3) He said "they went out from us" - In other words, they proclaimed to be Christians of the true church, i.e., the Apostle's church (4) These antichrists "deny that Jesus (the man) is the Christ" - John talks more about this in 1 John 4:3 where we will see the fulfillment of this teaching being taught today. {Key verse} - 1 John 4 - 1 "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. 2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 4. Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world." - Here John is saying that us Christians i.e., ye of God, are to "overcome them" or we are to discerned who they are. Have you wondered like me why John was so adamant in making sure all of his followers understood that Jesus did in fact become flesh, just like you me? John wanted people to know that he laughed and cried with Jesus, they both slept outside in the woods, they both had to relieve themselves when they could find some privacy, they both had strong body odors when they could not wash, and they were both tempted in every way just like all of his followers; Jesus Christ was fully man and God.
WHY IS THIS SO IMPORTANT to understand that Jesus was born with a sin nature just like you and me? The reason is because you can have a person who:
BUT, if this person claims that Jesus was not a man (person just like you and me) that Jesus did not receive the "sin nature" from his mother, this person is an antichrist. Guess who this points to?
This is what the Catholic faith teaches about Jesus Christ coming in the "flesh": 491. "Through the centuries the Church has become ever more aware that Mary, 'full of grace' through God, [Lk 1:28] was redeemed from the moment of her conception. That is what the dogma of the Immaculate Conception confesses, as Pope Pius IX proclaimed in 1854: The most Blessed Virgin Mary was, from the first moment of her conception, by a singular grace and privilege of almighty God and by virtue of the merits of JESUS Christ, Saviour of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of ORIGINAL SIN. [Pius IX, Ineffabilis Deus (1854): DS 2803 You can also verify this in the online version of the Catechism book... http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1K.HTM 492. The "splendor of an entirely unique holiness" by which Mary is "enriched from the first instant of her conception" comes wholly from Christ: she is "redeemed, in a more exalted fashion, by reason of the merits of her Son".136 The Father blessed Mary more than any other created person "in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places" and chose her "in Christ before the foundation of the world, to be holy and blameless before him in love".137 493. The Fathers of the Eastern
tradition call the Mother of God "the All-Holy" (Panagia), and celebrate her
as "free from any stain of sin", as though fashioned by the Holy
Spirit and formed as a new creature".138 By
the grace of God Mary remained free of every personal sin her whole life
long. Mary - "ever-virgin" 499. The deepening of faith in the virginal motherhood led the Church to confess Mary's real and perpetual virginity even in the act of giving birth to the Son of God made man.154 In fact, Christ's birth "did not diminish his mother's virginal integrity but sanctified it."155 and so the liturgy of the Church celebrates Mary as Aeiparthenos, the "Ever-virgin".156 504. Jesus is conceived by the Holy Spirit in the Virgin Mary's womb because he is the New Adam, who inaugurates the new creation: "The first man was from the earth, a man of dust; the second man is from heaven."162 From his conception, Christ's humanity is filled with the Holy Spirit, for God "gives him the Spirit without measure."163 From "his fullness" as the head of redeemed humanity "we have all received, grace upon grace."164 505. By his virginal conception, Jesus, the New Adam, ushers in the new birth of children adopted in the Holy Spirit through faith. "How can this be?"165 Participation in the divine life arises "not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God".166 The acceptance of this life is virginal because it is entirely the Spirit's gift to man. the spousal character of the human vocation in relation to God167 is fulfilled perfectly in Mary's virginal motherhood. As you can read the leaders of the Holy Roman Catholic church teach that Mary was perfect and sinless and she brought forth a perfect and sinless Son; yet our Bible teaches that "Jesus was tempted in all ways yet did not sin" (Heb 2:18 and 4:15.) Again we are all born with a sinful nature, we choose to sin when we come to the age of accountability; Jesus was born with this same sinful nature, the difference was, He chose not to sin. Jesus was born in the water (the womb) and was baptized in the Holy Spirit. John and Paul were giving clues to the early Church warning them who the antichrist would be. John told us one of the main things the antichrist will claim is that Jesus Christ was not fully human with a sin nature. Now for Paul's clues:
KEY: 2 Thessalonians 2:1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, {unto him: or, around him} 2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. 3 Let no man (1)deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a (2)falling away first, and that (3)man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4 Who (4)opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he (5)as God (6)sitteth in the (7)temple of God, (8)shewing himself that he is God. (1) Jesus said the same thing in Mat 24:4 "And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. 5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. (The Pope says he is Christ on earth) (2) The "falling away" comes from within the Church as Paul was writing this letter to the Church, moreover he said "don't you know you are the Temple of God"? (3) Antichrist (Strong's dictionary) interpreted as one who substitutes for Jesus Christ, Son of God, just as an antipope substituted himself into the office of the Papacy. (4) Opposeth or denies that Jesus Christ came in the flesh and exalteth; each time a priest gives communion, they believe they have the power to bring back Jesus Christ to this earth turning the bread into His actual flesh, and the wine into His actual blood. (5) The "white" Pope believes he is god on earth - (8) From "Crossing The Threshold of Hope", by Pope John Paul II: First Chapter: "The Pope": A Scandal and a Mystery
Note that on page three of the Pope's book, "represents the Son of God" is synonymous with "Vicar of Jesus Christ". A vicar clearly represents, substitutes for, or "takes the place" of another, as stated. Consequently "represents the Son of God" can be translated in Latin as Vicarius Filii Dei, which in Roman Numerals will add up to 666. The title Vicarius Christi, translated into English, means a substitute for Christ, i.e., Antichrist, as demonstrated above, which is applied by the Pope to every bishop of the Catholic Church! One of the major verse in the NT that a futurist use for a "future" one-world antichrist is 2 Thes 2:6: "know what withholdeth (or restrains} that he (antichrist) might be revealed".. However, if you read closely to what Paul was saying to his Church 5 "Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? 6 And now ye know...: Paul like John was giving clues to the Church that something in the future was going to be removed and then the antichrist will make himself known. Paul personally told his congregation who this force or power was but he knew better then to put it in writing as he was already getting threats from the circumcised Jews and he didn't want an even greater power to treated him and his young flock, i.e., the Roman government. Yes, Paul knew that Rome in the near future going to break up into 10 kingdoms and one of the smaller kingdoms (horns) was first going to destroy 3 of the kingdoms which is going to be the first clue, then this ruler will proclaim that he is Christ on earth or the Vicar of Christ. Paul knew this by reading the Book of Daniel and because the Holy Spirit revealed it to him. 2 Thessalonians 2:5 "Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? 6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. {withholdeth: or, holdeth} 7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: 9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 2 Thes 2:3-11: "Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition"
O.k., lets
now read some more commentaries from a few of our Christian
fathers to see what they think about these many
antichrists:
Martin Luther (1483-1546)
(Lutheran): "Luther ... proved, by the revelations of Daniel and St. John,
by the epistles of St. Paul, St. Peter, and St. Jude, that the reign of
Antichrist, predicted and described in the Bible, was the
Papacy ... And all the people did say, Amen! A holy terror seized
their souls. It was Antichrist whom they beheld seated
on the pontifical throne. This new idea, which derived greater
strength from the prophetic descriptions launched forth by Luther into the
midst of his contemporaries, inflicted the most terrible blow on Rome."
Taken from J. H. Merle D'aubigne's History of the Reformation of the Sixteen
Century, book vi, chapter xii, p. 215.
Now it is time to look a little
deeper into the teachings of the Catholic church on who is really the true
Christ (on earth) today: "The letters inscribed in the Pope's miter are these 'VICARIUS FILII DEI'. which is the Latin for 'VICAR OF THE SON OF GOD.' Catholics hold that the church, which is a visible society, must have a visible head. Christ, before his ascension into heaven, appointed St. Peter to act as His representative... Hence to the Bishop of Rome, as head of the church, was given the title, 'VICAR OF CHRIST'." Our Sunday Visitor, (Catholic Weekly) "Bureau of information," Huntington, Ind., April 18, 1915. Rev 17-18: there are many 'names' to the office of Pope Each of these names do in fact have a numeric value simply because LATIN, the chosen language of Rome, is not only their ALPHABET, it is also their NUMERIC SYSTEM! To this day the Latin "Numeric System" is called, ROMAN NUMERALS. For example, in their alphabet, the letter "I" = 1, and the letter "C" = 100 in Latin. Vicarius Filii Dei, is cited by the rector of Berlin, Andreas Helwig [or Helwich] (1572-1643) in his Antichristus Romanus. PLUS, if you would like many more documented facts as well as copies of Roman Catholic publications with "Vicarius Filii Dei" displayed within them, see this page... http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/666.htm A quick side note ->
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE WORD ANTICHRIST
The Vicar of Christ (Vicarius Christi)
"Vicar of Christ . . . Title used almost exclusively of the Bishop of Rome as successor of Peter and, therefore, the one in the Church who particularly takes the place of Christ; but used also of bishops in general and even of priests. First used by the Roman Synod of A.D. 495 to refer to Pope Gelasius; more commonly in Roman curial usage to refer to the Bishop of Rome during the pontificate of Pope Eugene III (1145-1153). Pope Innocent III (1198-1216) asserted explicitly that the Pope is the Vicar of Christ; further defined at the Council of Florence in the Decree for the Greeks (1439) and Vatican Council I in Pastor Aerternus (1870). The Second Vatican Council, in Lumen Gentium , n.27, calls bishops in general "vicars and legates of Christ." All bishops are vicars of Christ for their local churches in their ministerial functions as priest, prophet, and king, as the Pope is for the universal church; the title further denotes they exercise their authority in the Church not by delegation from any other person, but from Christ Himself."
Source: Catholic Dictionary, Peter M.J. Stravinskas, Editor, published by Our Sunday Visitor, Inc., Huntington, 1993, pp. 484-485.
THE WORDS VICARIOUS AND VICAR
Now look up the word vicarious in almost any common dictionary. Here is what you would find in the Webster Handy College Dictionary: "substituting for or, feeling in place of another."
Also in the Webster's II New Riverside Desk Dictionary for the definition of Vicar-
1. A parish priest in the Church of England.
2. A cleric in the Episcopal Church in charge of a chapel.
3. One who serves as a *substitute* for another.
A Vicar General is defined in the 1994 Catholic Almanac on page 330 as "a priest or bishop appointed by the bishop of a diocese to serve as his deputy, with ordinary executive power, in the administration of the diocese." So a vicar serves in the place of (substituting for) the bishop, and assumes his power of office for certain duties.
So the Papal title of VICAR OF CHRIST which in Latin is VICARIUS CHRISTI, means a SUBSTITUTE FOR CHRIST, which is synonymous with Antichrist, i.e., assuming the power of God on earth! This blasphemous claim is made repeatedly by various Popes and is the very foundation of Roman Catholicism and it's Papacy.
Some Catholics may protest that the Pope represents, but does not substitute for Jesus Christ, to avoid the association.
Now, from the Webster Hand College Dictionary, the definition of the word represent:
1. portray; depict; describe.
2. play the role of; impersonate.
3. denote; symbolize; stand for.
4. speak and act for; *be a substitute for*.
5. set forth; assert.
6. be composed of; consist in.Clearly then, Vicar of Christ (Vicarius Christi) and Antichrist have exactly the same meaning. The Pope substitutes himself in place of God on earth, and that is *exactly* the meaning of Antichrist.
VICAR OF THE SON OF GOD
Some Catholics will claim that the title VICARIUS FILII DEI is an anti-catholic fabrication, a complete fake, never used by the Catholic church. One example of this is online at the Catholic
Envoy Magazine in the article titled
Pope Fiction by Patrick Madrid (See Fiction 5).
My complete discussion with Patrick Madrid.
The following evidence is offered to prove that VICARIUS FILII DEI is indeed genuine.
Vicarius Filii Dei translated in English is Vicar of the Son of God, a phrase that has been used by Catholics:
... there are Catholics who talk against the temporal power of the Pope, either because they have been stunned by the clamours of a Protestant people, or because they are white-hearted, and have not courage to stand in the face of popular falsehood for an unpopular truth. The spirit of Protestant Englandits lawlessness, its pride, its contempt, and its enmity to the Church of Godhas made Catholics too to be cold-hearted, even when the Vicar of Jesus Christ is insulted. We have need, then, to be upon our guard. It shall happen once more with some, as it did when the Son of God was in His Passionthey saw Him betrayed, bound, carried away, buffeted, blindfolded, and scourged; they saw Him carry His Cross to Calvary, then nailed upon it, and lifted up to the scorn of the world; and they said, "If he be the king of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him."* So in like manner they say now, "See this Catholic Church, this Church of God, feeble and weak, rejected even by the very nations called Catholic. There is Catholic France, and Catholic Germany, and Catholic Italy, giving up this exploded figment of the temporal power of the Vicar of Jesus Christ." And
* St. Matt. xxvii. 42.
so, because the Church seems weak, and the Vicar of the Son of God is renewing the Passion of his Master upon earth, therefore we are scandalized, therefore we turn our faces from him. Where, then, is our faith? But the Son of God foretold these things when He said, "And now I have told you, before it come to pass; that when it shall come to pass, you may believe."*
* St. John xiv. 29.
... Lastly, the only other point upon which I shall speak to is this. We have already seen how the powers and glories of the Holy See have been progressively unfolding; how the time of St. Gregory I. was a period of apostolic missions, converting the nations to the faith; how the time of St. Leo III. was a period
of creating the Christian world; how the time of St. Gregory VII. was a period of purifying the sanctuary of the Church; and how the time of Alexander III. was a period of royalty of government and of ecclesiastical order, when the divine power of the church directed, by a firm and sacred authority, the civil powers of the world within the sphere of the law of God and of obedience to the faith. Now I observe these powers of the Holy See have been always rising, always culminating. The temporal power in the hand of St. Gregory I. was a fatherly and patriarchal rule over nations not as yet reduced to civil order. In the hands of St. Leo III. it became a power of building empires. In the hands of St. Gregory VII. it was a scourge to chasten them. In the hands of Alexander III. it was a dynasty, ruling supremely, in the name of God, over the powers of the world. And now in these later times the temporal sovereignty has become a law of the conscience, an axiom of the reason. Through long contests and denials it has passed into consciences, intellects, and hearts of men. Like the great dogmas of the Church, through controversy it has reached its analysis and expression. It stands by the side of the Immaculate Conception a theological certainty, if not a definition. So that I may say there never was a time when the temporal power of the Vicar of the Son of God, though assailed as we see it, was more firmly rooted through-
out the whole unity of the Catholic Church in the hearts and convictions of its members; and that by a double process, not only by its own proper evidence, not only by the light of God's dealing with the world, but by contrast. For the nations of Europe have already seen that the society of the world, without the guidance and preservation of the Church of God, resolves itself into confusion. They have seen every form of political society, and the confederations of kingdoms and nations, dissolve and pass away. While all the floating societies of the world have drifted down the stream, the centre of obedience has become more stable. Men have learned from the history of modern Europe that the law which is called the law of nationsthat is, the rule of justice which regulates the relations of people with peoplehas become weak and powerless. And why? Because the nations have broken the bonds which bound them to the centre of obedience, and have shaken off the noble submission to a tribunal higher than man, from which came forth, in other days, the judgments of equity and of justice. It was a dignified obedience to bow to the Vicar of the Son of God, and to remit the arbitration of their griefs to one whom all wills consented to obey.
Source: The Temporal Power of the Vicar of Jesus Christ, by Henry Edward Manning, D.D. (appointed Archbishop of Westminster in 1865 and Cardinal in 1875), second edition with a preface, published in 1862 in London by Burns & Lambert, 17 &18 Portman Street.
More to come